13 September 2009

Yo man, do u shoot me with ur logic??

The blue is over the “cup”. Okies make this as a sub heading for today, shall we?

It may sound undisruptive to some of people yet to me tho. Out of blue I get to know that not all people will be able to being satisfied with other parties. Okies, why this can be happened to the surface? Now, I start to summon up back to the function of human’s brain (arh..am digging for some terms from psycholinguistic (psychology and linguistic-science of language) views). We have our own mental development which brings some sort of learning and thinking paving in term of entomologist, ontology and methodologies of understanding, digesting and comprehend anything which can be received by some tonics and at the end will be carried by human’ sensory either from sound or wave or via touching. Okies, Let me take from the perspective of wave stimulation and oscillation. (Psycholinguists-correct me if am wrong). So it has to be connected by the ears, sounds,brain and human..So, lets go one by one ok…

Ok, from the point of views of Physic studies- the sounds that we can hear are created briskly in the air pressure around 101,325 of atmosefera pressure which is in the consistent value and the more bigger its changes ( consistent value) the more clearly and overtly it can be heard. Sound is created when the air is being disturbed or in other word it can be imagined by having this analogy – imagine that a stone is fallen down to the clear water and we can see the waves which are created and these waves are seen in the surface. So this state of affair seems to be similar to the concept of “air is being disturbed” and the more clear the “electrical impulse” can be picked up by the ears and the function of ears is to detect those changing in the consistent value of sound. Okies, enough from this perspective. Thank god that I have to know this for my coursework readings! (sigh) . Okies the above information are about the natures of sound and now we try to understand the natures of human in order to understand and precive the sound. At the end we will be able to understand why there are some communication problems which warp our mood in order to talk and converse in anyway?Let we consider this in order to understand some focal points about human communication..

From the prespective of language and communication, as am talking about human’s nature of conversation and my focal point is about the interaction activity, so I bring ur attention to see it from the perspective of Information organization (information-integration theory which is one of theories of human communication) and the theory centers on the way people accumulate and organize information about some person, object, situation or ideas and attitude .
An attitude is a position to act in a positive or negative way toward some projects. The information-integration theory is one of the natures of attitudes and attitude change! The theory says that there are two factors which are affecting your attitudes which are valance; refers to weather information supports your beliefs and attitudes, it has “positive” valance, and Weight; refers to the weight you assign to the information and it function to the credibility of what you are trying to say. If you have less weight than you are talking something which may be deemed as crap or nothing- someone has pointing this to me and thanks again as I am try to put thin in the line of conversation in the next agenda, i hope so.
Theory of reasoned action refers to a certain way which is determined by your attitude toward the behaviour and set of beliefs about how other people would like you to behave. So, your intention to do something seems to be identical to your attitude toward the behaviors times the strength of that attitude plus what others think times the strength of their position. Here is the formula of this theory:-

Bi = AbW1 + (SN)w2
Where
Bi = behavior Intention
Ab = attitude toward the behavior
SN = subject Norm (What others think)
W1 = Weight of attitude
W2 = weight of subjective norm

My contemplation regarding the information will be like this - to make these clear, you will try to respond (your verbal languages and paralinguistic cues) are very much depended and upon to your treats (let say someone tries to harm you via his or her words, you may think that you need to say “give and take” so you keen to take some precautions in order not to get innocuous tru your emotion fortification! So based on my opinion, this seems to be one of the biggest issues and comes to the surface when you and your partners try to sit in a round table, basically. Or even when you try to have informal chat- conversational or vitrual mode of interaction!

Yeah, it is quite a long time I have not been writing such ‘tense” thing as I got some comments from my readers but sometime it is good to have such reading in order to make the brain to be negative to any development of Curst which kills the brain cells and this makes us no to think more spacious upon to some circumstances. Well, the notes above are real and quoted from some of my reading material. If we understood the norm of human communication, i guess we will have less conflict and more joys when we are in the line of rejoicing and sucking than Fcukin’ the beautiful of life. English literature says that -by taking into account what is arisen by Psychoanalytic theory, we have Id, Ego and Superego. Normally we have ego which puts us in the "cozy" zone in order to be in logic but if the superego takes place and above all, that means the person is racing within himself in order to be much higher than others. I can say that, because of the he tries to manipulate all the talks in order to gain some social respects while in the line of communicating with each other. Correct me if i am wrong, aigan?.fuh,thanks to my coursework reading packets which give me some inpv.If you want to have more and reading for more on the above issues or terms then just give me a Buzz.till then…


xoxoxox...Josh is happy to blog now...(sigh)

2 comments:

kaiserstan said...

Cool info dude...Id, Ego, Superego? i have different but almost the same view with. Will explain later...

JoshDcap said...

yeah.my explanation abt those id,ego n superego are to light.will blog bout them later.